United States v. Hernan Gomez-Gutierrez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-30192California287 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30192

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00123-DCN-

v.

HERNAN GOMEZ-GUTIERREZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Hernan Gomez-Gutierrez appeals pro se from the district court’s orders

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

and motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In the district court, the government argued that Gomez-Gutierrez’s motion

should be denied because he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.