Rodney Banks v. J. Pelayo
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-15688California283 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RODNEY BANKS, No. 21-15688
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00117-DAD-JLT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. PELAYO, Correctional Officer at Kern
Valley State Prison; A. LEYVA, Correctional Officer at Kern Valley State Prison,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Rodney Banks appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the
First and Fourteenth Amendments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo a…