Michael Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-16108California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, No. 21-16108

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01279-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

INTEL CORPORATION; ARM, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

EVANGELINA ALMIRANTERENA; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Michael A. Bruzzone appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his post-judgment motion in his action alleging claims arising from a previous qui

tam action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

of discretion a denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.