Michael Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-16108California292 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, No. 21-16108
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01279-WHA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
INTEL CORPORATION; ARM, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
EVANGELINA ALMIRANTERENA; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Michael A. Bruzzone appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his post-judgment motion in his action alleging claims arising from a previous qui
tam action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse
of discretion a denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…