Gustavo Escamilla v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-55417California307 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUSTAVO ESCAMILLA; GREENWAY No. 21-55417

NUTRIENTS, INC.,

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01910-ODW-JEM Petitioners-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Gustavo Escamilla and Greenway Nutrients, Inc. appeal from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging violations of the Crime Victims’

Rights Act (“CRVA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.