Frank Mahuka , Jr. v. William Aila, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202220-16369California538 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK MAHUKA, Jr.; JOAKIM No. 20-16369

MAHUKA,

D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00177-LEK-RT Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM J. AILA, Jr., Deputy Director, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Frank Mahuka, Jr. and Joakim Mahuka appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of

the Takings Clause and due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo. Cervantes v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.