Bright Harry v. Kcg Americas LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-16258California457 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIGHT HARRY; RONALD STEPHEN No. 21-16258

DRAPER,

D.C. No. 4:20-cv-07352-HSG Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

KCG AMERICAS LLC; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Bright Harry and Ronald Stephen Draper appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their action, declaring them vexatious litigants, and

entering a pre-filing review order against them. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.