Brandy Sandoval v. Seth Melvin
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-35213California339 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRANDY MARIE SANDOVAL, No. 21-35213
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:19-cv-00712-YY
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SETH MELVIN, Winston Police Department,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
SERGEANT TURNER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted March 16, 2022**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Brandy Marie Sandoval appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Officer Seth Melvin violated
her constitutional rights by using excessive force when arresting her. We…