Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ARTEM KOSHKALDA, No. 21-15695

Debtor. D.C. No. 4:19-cv-05696-YGR ______________________________

ARTEM KOSHKALDA, MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION; EPSON

AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor Artem Koshkalda appeals pro se from the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order finding Koshkalda in contempt

and imposing sanctions in the adversary proceeding against him. We have

jurisdiction under…