Albert Smith v. Charles Ryan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 202221-15532California288 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERT VAUGHN SMITH, No. 21-15532

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02657-MTL-ESW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Albert Vaughn Smith appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo legal

rulings on exhaustion and for clear error disputed issues of material fact. Albino v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.