In re K.T.
Opinion
Opinion
FACTS
CFS began investigating this family for physical abuse in January 2019 after one
of mother’s children died in her care and the autopsy revealed the child bore signs of
nonaccidental trauma. At the time, mother and D.’s father, D.M., were living together and
caring for K.T. and his younger half brother, D.M., Jr., who is not a party to this appeal.
D. had not yet been born, and K.T.’s father, was incarcerated.
At the initial detention hearing in March 2019, mother claimed Blackfeet ancestry
through the maternal grandfather. She provided his full legal name and phone number, as
well as the name, phone number, and address of the maternal aunt. The maternal
grandmother, who was also present at the hearing, provided dates and places of birth for
the maternal grandfather and great-grandmother. The juvenile court told mother CFS
would try to obtain additional information from these family members, but the record
contains no indication they ever did. Instead, a few weeks later, CFS sent notice to the
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana that omitted tribal and
biological information for the maternal great-grandmother, despite the…