Sutherland

Sutherland v. Arent CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2022A160404California4,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL

BACKGROUND

This dispute centers on property in Lakeport held in a trust created by Samuel James Arent and Lorna Mae Arent. Samuel and Lorna had four children: respondent Candyce Sutherland, Rebecca Draper, appellant Brien Arent, and Dan Arnet (previously Arent).1 In June 1989, Samuel and Lorna purchased and moved to a 76-acre property on Scotts Valley Road (“the Ranch”) that includes a ranch house on one side of the road and a cabin on the other. They later bought two additional nearby properties: a hayfield with no structures, and a 15-acre parcel across the road from the Ranch that includes a house. Samuel and Lorna bought the second property with a house because appellants—Brien and his longtime partner, Eva Keiser—were expecting their third child and were “in dire need of a place to live.” Appellants moved into the home after it was purchased in late 1992. According to testimony at trial, Brien has a history of drug use, has grown marijuana, has been in jail multiple times, and has a felony conviction for fraud related to welfare benefits. In late 1995, Samuel and Lorna placed all three properties into the Samuel J. Arent and Lorna M. Arent 1995…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.