Jonathan Vanloan v. Nation of Islam

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-55317California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

MAR 25 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN AMBROSE VANLOAN, No. 21-55317

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00127-GW-MRW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NATION OF ISLAM; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jonathan Ambrose VanLoan appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112

(9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed VanLoan’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.