Jane Doe v. Gavin Newsom
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-55362California340 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
O. L., AKA Jane Doe, No. 21-55362
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-04525-JAK-PVC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
O.L. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motion for a
preliminary injunction and dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging equal
protection and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…