Jane Doe v. Gavin Newsom

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-55362California340 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

O. L., AKA Jane Doe, No. 21-55362

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-04525-JAK-PVC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

O.L. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motion for a

preliminary injunction and dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging equal

protection and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.