Ellen Krikorian v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-16354California294 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELLEN KRIKORIAN, No. 21-16354

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02274-DWL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., previously named Bank of America,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Ellen Krikorian appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her diversity action alleging various claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Pickern v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., 457 F.3d 963,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Krikorian’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. 968 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.