Cristobal Cervantes v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-55266California306 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISTOBAL CERVANTES, No. 21-55266

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-01180-CJC-JC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Cristobal Cervantes appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition and order

denying reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review the dismissal of the § 2241 petition de novo, see Alaimalo v. United States,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 645 F.3d 1042, 1047 (9th Cir. 2011), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.