Andrew Moret v. Poornima Ranganathan
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-35424California438 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREW GUY MORET, No. 21-35424
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:18-cv-01105-MK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
POORNIMA RANGANATHAN; ANDREA
DAILEY,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
OREGON STATE HOSPITAL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Andrew Guy Moret appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations arising
from the involuntary administration of medication during his pretrial detention.