Andrew Moret v. Poornima Ranganathan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202221-35424California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW GUY MORET, No. 21-35424

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:18-cv-01105-MK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

POORNIMA RANGANATHAN; ANDREA

DAILEY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

OREGON STATE HOSPITAL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Andrew Guy Moret appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations arising

from the involuntary administration of medication during his pretrial detention.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. JL Beverage

Co., LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.