Hendrix

Hendrix v. Deane CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2022B306205California4,476 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/25/22 Hendrix v. Deane CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

BERNIE D. HENDRIX, B306205

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STRO07628) v.

ROBERT DEANE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steve Cochran, Judge. Affirmed.

CDF Labor Law, Dan M. Forman and Allison O. Chua for Defendant and Appellant.

Bernie D. Hendrix in pro. per. for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________ Robert Deane appeals from the civil harassment restraining order issued against him, protecting petitioner Bernie Hendrix. Deane argues that the parties were in a labor dispute and that the trial court erred when it did not apply the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.