Antholine Fernandez v. Bridgecrest Credit Co.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHOLINE FERNANDEZ; RONALD No. 19-56378

FERNANDEZ,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 5:19-cv-00877-MWF-SHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BRIDGECREST CREDIT COMPANY,

LLC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, appeals from the

district court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration pursuant to California

law and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C.

§ 16. Reviewing de novo, O’Connor v. Uber Techs., Inc., 904 F.3d 1087, 1093 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Cir. 2018), we reverse and remand.

1. Bridgecrest argues that Plaintiffs-Appellees Antholine and…