People v. Norton CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2022C090923California8,657 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/28/22 P. v. Norton CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

THE PEOPLE, C090923

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCCRCRF- 2018-87-1) v.

MATTHEW EDWARD NORTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Matthew Edward Norton was convicted by a jury of sexually assaulting his 15-year-old niece, B.S., when she was staying overnight at the house defendant shared with his girlfriend.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.90(b)(4), (10), we identify B.S. by her initials, continuing the procedure followed in the trial court, and others where appropriate by their first names or first name and an initial for the last name.

1 On appeal, defendant contends that the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.