Disieno

Disieno v. Nohr CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2022B311576California2,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

Filed 3/29/22 Disieno v. Nohr CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

JULIA DISIENO, 2d Civ. No. B311576 (Super. Ct. No. 20CV02397) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

MARY NOHR et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Appellant Julia DiSieno operated a non-profit animal rescue facility out of her backyard in Solvang. A series of heated confrontations with neighbors over the facility resulted in the District Attorney filing criminal charges against DiSieno for stalking, criminal threats, and assault and battery. A jury acquitted her of the charges. This matter arises from DiSieno’s subsequent civil action against neighbors Mary Nohr, Richard Nohr, and Jay Bardessono for malicious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.