In re R.K. CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2022B310579California959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/29/22 In re R.K. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re R.K., a Person Coming Under B310579, B311477 the Juvenile Law. (Los Angeles County ___________________________________ Super. Ct. No.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 19LJJP00325A)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

M.J. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from findings and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robin R. Kesler, Judge Pro Tempore. Dismissed. Christine E. Johnson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant M.J. Benjamin Ekenes, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant E.K. Amir Pichvai for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.