Palvindra Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 202220-72614California1,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PALVINDRA SINGH, No. 20-72614

Petitioner, Agency Nos. A208-549-493 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** S.R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Palvindra Singh (“Singh”) petitions to review the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) final removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. §

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. 1 1252. We deny the petition regarding the removal order because the BIA’s denial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.