Fermin Valenzuela v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
29 F.4th 1093
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 202220-55372California8,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERMIN VINCENT VALENZUELA; No. 20-55372 V.V., by and through their Guardian, Patricia Gonzalez, individually and D.C. Nos. as successors-in-interest of Fermin 8:17-cv-00278- Vincent Valenzuela, II, deceased; CJC-DFM X.V., by and through their Guardian, 8:17-cv-02094- Patricia Gonzalez, individually and CJC-DFM as successors-in-interest of Fermin Vincent Valenzuela, II, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER

v.

CITY OF ANAHEIM; DANIEL WOLFE;

WOOJIN JUN; DANIEL GONZALEZ,

Defendants-Appellants.

Filed March 30, 2022

Before: John B. Owens and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges, and Michael H. Simon, * District Judge.

Order; Statement by Judge Bea; Dissent by Judge Collins

* The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Civil Rights

The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing and denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc in a civil rights action in which the panel affirmed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.