People v. Washington CA1/1

DISCUSSION

We have examined the record to determine if any arguable issue is present. We have found none. Defendant was ably represented by counsel. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial. Substantial evidence supports

4 Judge Moorman, exercising great patience, explained to defendant the rights defendant would be giving up, including the right to have 12 people from the community unanimously reach a verdict, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the right to object to the admissibility of evidence in that transcript.

3 defendant’s conviction. We find no meritorious sentencing issues requiring reversal of the judgment. We therefore agree with defendant’s counsel that no issues are present that could undermine defendant’s conviction. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

4

MARGULIES, J.

WE CONCUR:

HUMES, P. J.

EAST, J.

A163045

People v. Washington

 Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

5