Marriage of Kinney CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 23, 2019, the family court entered a stipulated judgment dissolving
William’s and Rachel’s marriage. The parties agreed that Rachel would have sole legal
and physical custody over their two minor children and that William would have no
visitation. They also agreed that the family court should set William’s child support
obligation at zero.
On November 14, 2019, the department filed a motion to modify William’s child
support obligation.2 William opposed the motion claiming that, if his child support
obligation were modified, it should not be in the amount prayed for by the department,
$2,226 a month. Inter alia, he argued the department’s motion failed to properly consider
Rachel’s income and William’s liabilities, to wit, his federal and state taxes, spousal and
child support obligations from prior marriages, and health care premiums.
William, who is incarcerated, made no appearance for the January 24, 2020
hearing on his opposition to the department’s motion. Rachel, who appeared
telephonically, testified William receives a full military retirement of $43,140 annually
and Veteran’s Administration (VA) disability benefits…