M.M.

M.M. v. Superior Court CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 2022F083720California6,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/1/22 M.M. v. Superior Court CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

M.M.,

F083720

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. JV8254) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUOLUMNE OPINION

COUNTY,

Respondent;

TUOLUMNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

SOCIAL SERVICES,

Real Party in Interest.

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. Frank Dougherty, Judge. (Retired Judge of the Merced Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) M.M., in pro. per., for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Sarah Carrillo, County Counsel, and Maria Sullivan, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo-

* Before Meehan, Acting P. J., Snauffer, J. and DeSantos, J. Petitioner, M.M. (mother), in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.