Marriage of Zucker

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 2022B281051MCalifornia26,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/1/22 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re the Marriage of B281051 (Cons. w B284981) KIM and MARK S. ZUCKER. (Los Angeles County KIM ZUCKER, Super. Ct. No. BD 546573) Appellant,

ORDER MODIFYING

v. OPINION (CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT)

MARK S. ZUCKER,

Respondent.

THE COURT:*

The opinion filed March 3, 2022, in the above-entitled matter is ordered MODIFIED as follows: On page 56, in the first full paragraph, the two references to “child support” are changed to “spousal support.” On page 61, delete the last three full paragraphs and replace them with the following: After entering a fee order on March 17, 2017, the court’s amended fee order, dated May 10, 2017, superseded that order in certain respects and found that “[u]sing $3,539,469 as the fees and expert costs incurred by [Mark] and $3,706,672 as the fees and costs incurred by [Kim], plus $301,046 for court reporting and privately compensated reference judge fees produces total charges incurred by both sides of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.