We Advocate Through Environmental Review v. City of Mount Shasta CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 2022C091012California4,593 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/12/22 We Advocate Through Environmental Review v. City of Mount Shasta CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

WE ADVOCATE THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL C091012 REVIEW et al., (Super. Ct. No. Plaintiffs and Appellants, SCCVPT20180531)

v.

CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

CRYSTAL GEYSER WATER COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

From 2001 to 2010, a water bottling company operated a plant in Siskiyou County (the County) that extracted groundwater and then used it to produce bottled water. A few years after the plant closed, Crystal Geyser Water Company (Crystal Geyser) bought the facility and sought to revive it. To that end, Crystal Geyser requested, among…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.