Peterson

Peterson v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company etc. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 2022E075199California5,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/8/22 Peterson v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company etc. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DALE ALLEN PETERSON ,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E075199

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1722277)

ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR OPINION

COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Randall S. Stamen,

Judge. Affirmed.

Dale A. Peterson, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Polsinelli, Wesley D. Hurst and J. Alan Warfield for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Dale Allen Peterson appeals the grant of summary

judgment in favor of defendants and respondents Enterprise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.