Colapinto
Colapinto v. Stoll CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
Having reviewed the record and the briefs, we share the trial court’s lack of
confidence in the relative credibility of any of the parties to this action. Therefore, we
rely only on testimony of the parties which is undisputed and which identifies or
contextualizes the documentary evidence.
Plaintiff and Peter Stoll were friends for over thirty years. Plaintiff was an
entrepreneur who held licenses to sell Vatican themed gift items through various business
entities. Peter was an attorney whose practice centered on tax matters, bankruptcy and
commercial litigation, but who was disbarred. Following his disbarment, he continued to
3 advise plaintiff and plaintiff’s attorneys. Specifically, in the late 1980s or early 1990s,
Peter advised plaintiff regarding a lien imposed by the California Employment
Development Department (EDD) on plaintiff’s property.
Also in the 1980s, plaintiff sought to take his business, Design Giftware,
International (DGI), public, and partnered with a businessman, Scott Sherman, who had
the means to accomplish the goal. Plaintiff and Sherman entered into an arrangement
whereby plaintiff acquired stock in Sherman’s public entities and…