Mori

Mori v. Murdock CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 2022G058649California3,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goethals, J.

INTRODUCTION

This case disproves the old adage that good fences make good neighbors. Brett Murdock and Veronica Murdock (the Murdocks) discovered that the fence between their property and the property of their neighbors, Setsuko Mori Ogino and Hiroshi Ogino (the Oginos), was not on the property line, but rather was encroaching on the Murdocks’ property. The Murdocks built a new block wall on the property line, and the Oginos sued to quiet title to the disputed land. After a bench trial, the trial court created an equitable easement in the disputed land—approximately 15 square feet. The Murdocks appealed. We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings regarding the equitable easement, and the creation of the easement was within the court’s authority and jurisdiction. Further, the trial court did not err in denying the Murdocks relief from their waiver of a jury trial. The Murdocks also appealed from an order denying them attorney fees in connection with the Oginos’ recordation of a lis pendens on the Murdocks’ property. We find no error in the court’s discretionary order, and therefore affirm that order as well.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

This case involves a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.