Mike Murphy's Enterprises v. Fineline Industries CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 2022F080048California11,737 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/13/22 Mike Murphy’s Enterprises v. Fineline Industries CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

MIKE MURPHY’S ENTERPRISES, INC.,

F080048

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 16CV01617) v.

FINELINE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Merced County. Brian L. McCabe, Judge. Law Offices of Nicholas D. Heimlich, Nicholas D. Heimlich; Heimlich Law and Alan Heimlich for Plaintiff and Appellant. Quall Cardot, Matthew W. Quall, John M. Cardot and Matthew R. Dardenne for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- This is the first of two appeals in the ongoing patent and licensing dispute between appellant Mike Murphy’s Enterprises, Inc. (Murphy) and respondents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.