Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest
30 F.4th 929
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202219-16711California7,578 words
Opinion
Opinion
Collins, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CENTRAL SIERRA ENVIRONMENTAL No. 19-16711
RESOURCE CENTER; SIERRA FOREST
LEGACY, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 1:17-cv-00441-
LJO-SAB
v.
STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST; OPINION
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE;
JASON KUIKEN, Forest Supervisor of Stanislaus National Forest, Defendants-Appellees,
ROBERT BRENNAN; SHERRINE
BRENNAN; JESSE RIEDEL; JENNY
RIEDEL; CLIFTON HODGE;
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU
FEDERATION; CALIFORNIA
CATTLEMEN’S ASSOCIATION;
STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST
GRAZING PERMITEES ASSOCIATION,
Intervenor-Defendants- Appellees. CSERC V. STANISLAUS NAT’L FOREST
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 14, 2020 San Francisco, California
Filed April 8, 2022
Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Collins
SUMMARY *
Environmental Law
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment order, in which the district court rejected…