Zilberstein

Zilberstein v. Petersen CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 2022B311978California4,940 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

Filed 4/13/22 Zilberstein v. Petersen CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

AHRON ZILBERSTEIN, B311978

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No.18VECV00182) v.

MICHAEL PETERSEN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Judge Huey P. Cotton. Affirmed as modified. Law Offices of Stephen M. Feldman, Inc., and Stephen M. Feldman for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gavrilov & Brooks, Ognian Gavrilov and Michael Coleman for Defendant and Respondent.

____________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Ahron Zilberstein sued Michael Petersen for false impersonation (Pen. Code, § 528.5) and cyberpiracy (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17525) after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.