People v. Gomez CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
In 1995, defendant and appellant Ricarda Gomez pled guilty to one count of
possession for sale of cocaine base. (Health & Saf. Code, former § 11351.5, count 1.) A
trial court placed her on formal probation for a period of three years, with 180 days in
county jail. On January 1, 2017, Penal Code1 section 1473.7 went into effect. (Stats.
2016, ch. 739, § 1.) It permits a defendant to challenge a conviction based on a guilty
plea where prejudicial error affected the defendant’s ability to understand the
immigration consequences of the plea. (Pen. Code, § 1473.7.) In 2018, defendant filed a
motion to vacate her conviction under Penal Code sections 1016.5 and 1473.7. The court
denied the motion.
On appeal, defendant contends the court erred in denying her motion to vacate her
conviction. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2
A confidential reliable informant advised the police that subjects by the names of
Rosa and Toto were selling cocaine from their residence. The informant agreed to make
1 All further statutory references will be to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.