Ranjit Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 202218-71256California701 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANJIT SINGH, No. 18-71256

Petitioner, Agency No. A073-399-833

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Ranjit Singh, a citizen of India, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision denying his untimely and numerically barred motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. reopen his immigration proceedings, in which Singh sought asylum and withholding

of removal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.