Venoco, LLC v. Plains Pipeline, L.P.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202221-55193California2,665 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VENOCO, LLC, FKA Venoco, Inc., a No. 21-55193 Delaware limited liability company, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:16-cv-02988-PSG-JEM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PLAINS PIPELINE, L.P., a Texas limited partnership; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,** District Judge. Dissent by Judge HURWITZ.

Venoco, LLC (Venoco) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to set

aside a judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Venoco managed an offshore crude oil production…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.