United States v. D'Angelo Davis

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202221-10094California758 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2022

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10094 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:98-cr-00114-KJM-AC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

D’ANGELO DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 7, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and CHOE-GROVES,*** Judge.

D’Angelo Davis appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for

reconsideration of the denial of his motion for compassionate release under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Reviewing for abuse of discretion, United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th

Cir. 2021), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.