Longino Lazo-Flores v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202216-70515California821 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LONGINO ALBERTO LAZO-FLORES, No. 16-70515
Petitioner, Agency No. A099-534-850
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 8, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Longino Alberto Flores Lazo,1 also known as Longino Alberto
Lazo-Flores, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioner has explained that his correct family name is Flores Lazo, and we refer to him by this name in this memorandum disposition. denial of asylum, withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)
relief. We review…