Longino Lazo-Flores v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202216-70515California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LONGINO ALBERTO LAZO-FLORES, No. 16-70515

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-534-850

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 8, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Longino Alberto Flores Lazo,1 also known as Longino Alberto

Lazo-Flores, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioner has explained that his correct family name is Flores Lazo, and we refer to him by this name in this memorandum disposition. denial of asylum, withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

relief. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.