Enkhbold Dorj v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202216-71131California504 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ENKHBOLD DORJ; OYUNBAYAR No. 16-71131
MOONON; BATTUYA ENKHBOLD,
Agency Nos. A089-967-936 Petitioners, A089-967-937
A089-967-938
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 7, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Enkhbold Dorj, along with his wife and child, Oyunbayar Moonon
and Battuya Enkhbold, natives and citizens of Mongolia, filed a timely petition for
review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)…