Enkhbold Dorj v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 202216-71131California504 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENKHBOLD DORJ; OYUNBAYAR No. 16-71131

MOONON; BATTUYA ENKHBOLD,

Agency Nos. A089-967-936 Petitioners, A089-967-937

A089-967-938

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Enkhbold Dorj, along with his wife and child, Oyunbayar Moonon

and Battuya Enkhbold, natives and citizens of Mongolia, filed a timely petition for

review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.