Teodoro Batalla-Hurtado v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 202217-70348California898 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 11 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TEODORO BATALLA-HURTADO, No. 17-70348
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-975-861
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 8, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: PAEZ, CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Teodoro Batalla-Hurtado (“Batalla-Hurtado”) petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “We review the [BIA’s] legal [rulings] de novo . . . and its
factual…