Tim Davis v. salesforce.com, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202221-15867California973 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIM DAVIS; et al., No. 21-15867
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01753-MMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SALESFORCE.COM, INC.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 7, 2022 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, PAEZ, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs Tim Davis, Gregor Miguel, and Amanda Bredlow appeal from the
district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their action under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) for failure to state a
claim. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
1. Plaintiffs adequately alleged a claim for breach of the duty of prudence
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Page 2 of
under the pleading standard articulated in Bell Atlantic Corp. v.…