Ernest Jarrett v. James Terrell
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202221-55263California1,180 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 8 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERNEST JARRETT; ERNEST L. No. 21-55263
JARRETT, P.C.,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:19-cv-06234-MWF-GJS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAMES STEPHEN TERRELL; LAW
OFFICE OF JAMES S. TERRELL;
SHARON J. BRUNNER; LAW OFFICE
OF SHARON J. BRUNNER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 15, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
In connection with a short-lived representation of a client in a wrongful
death suit, Plaintiffs Ernest L. Jarrett and Ernest L. Jarrett, P.C. (collectively,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Jarrett) allege that Defendants owe approximately $2.67 million in attorneys’ fees
because (1) Defendants tortiously interfered with Jarrett’s contractual expectancy,
attorney client…