Jose Mendoza, Jr. v. Amalgamated Transit Union

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202220-16079California1,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MENDOZA, Jr., No. 20-16079

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 2:18-cv-00959-JCM-DJA and 2:17-cv-02485-JCM-CWH

ROBBIE HARRIS; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs,

v.

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION

INTERNATIONAL; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

JOSE MENDOZA, Jr.; et al., No. 20-16080

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. Nos. 2:18-cv-00959-JCM-DJA v. 2:17-cv-02485-JCM-CWH

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION

INTERNATIONAL; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Page 2 of

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 11, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, WATFORD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.