Hong Chen v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202216-70739California760 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HONG CHEN, No. 16-70739

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-886-785

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Hong Chen, a native and citizen of China, filed a timely petition for

review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing

his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review ‘denials of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.