At&t Mobility, LLC v. Charles Yeager

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 202220-17253California991 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 7 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, No. 20-17253

Plaintiff, D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00007-KJM-DB v.

ED BOWLIN; CONNIE BOWLIN; MEMORANDUM*

AVIATION AUTOGRAPHS; BOWLIN

& ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Defendants-cross- defendants-Appellees,

LAW OFFICES OF JOANNA R.

MENDOZA, P.C.; DE LA PENA &

HOLLIDAY, LLP; LESSER LAW

GROUP,

Defendants-cross- defendants,

v.

CHARLES E. YEAGER,

Defendant-cross-claimant,

VICTORIA YEAGER,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Intervenor-Defendant- Appellant,

v.

PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER,

Intervenor-Plaintiff.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 18, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant Victoria Yeager (“Yeager”), widow of the

late General Charles…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.