Juliana Calmo Matias v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 202220-72574California1,232 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIANA CALMO MATIAS; et al., No. 20-72574

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A209-159-178

A209-159-179

v. A209-159-180

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 7, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK,** District Judge.

Petitioners Juliana Calmo Matias (“Calmo Matias”), Sonia Matias Calmo

(“Sonia”), and Luis Matias Calmo (“Luis”), natives and citizens of Guatemala,

petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.