Ysaul Flores Peralta v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 202219-70274California1,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 5 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YSAUL FLORES PERALTA, No. 19-70274 19-72497 Petitioner, Agency No. A091-522-862 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 16, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,** District Judge.

Petitioner Ysaul Flores Peralta, a native and citizen of Mexico and lawful

permanent resident of the United States, seeks review of two Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) decisions.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). The jurisdiction-

stripping provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B) and (C) do not apply where, as

here, a petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.