United States v. Luis Alfaro-Hidalgo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202221-10066California1,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10066 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00035-MMD-WGC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUIS OSWALDO ALFARO-

HIDALGO, AKA Carlos Figueroa, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and CHOE-GROVES,*** Judge.

Luis Oswaldo Alfaro-Hidalgo appeals his conviction, after a conditional plea

of guilty, to a single count of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He contends that the

district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss his indictment based on an

asserted violation of his rights under the Sixth Amendment’s Speedy Trial Clause.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.