Roberta Bell v. Warden, Fci Dublin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 202221-15383California579 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTA RONIQUE BELL, No. 21-15383

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:17-cv-07346-LHK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WARDEN, FCI DUBLIN,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 18, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

In 1996, a federal jury found Roberta Ronique Bell (“Bell”) guilty of two

charges related to witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1), (b) in

connection with the torture and murder of Doreen Proctor (“Proctor”). She was

sentenced to life imprisonment on the murder charge. See id. § 1512(a). In 2017,

Bell sought to vacate her § 1512 convictions and requested a new trial because she

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. claimed that intervening Supreme Court precedent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.